Share your comments
Douglass and Lincoln : how a revolutionary Black leader and a reluctant liberato
Kendrick, Paul
Adult Nonfiction E449.D75 K46 2008
From Publishers' Weekly:
Paul Kendrick, assistant director of the Harlem Children's Zoo, and his father, Stephen, a Boston minister (coauthors of Sarah's Long Walk, about Boston's free blacks) give a thorough look at two unlikely allies. Lincoln began as a white supremacist who saw Douglass as an exception to the rule of black inferiority. What is more, his first priority was the preservation of the Union. The onetime slave Douglass, on the other hand, stood uncompromisingly for complete emancipation, to be followed by full and equal citizenship. He further held that the Civil War's massive carnage could only be redeemed by the annihilation of the "peculiar institution." Despite their mutual respect, the two men had only three face-to-face meetings, just two of these in private. Thus, this study of Douglass, Lincoln and their "relationship" is chiefly a discussion of evolving rhetoric, primarily Lincoln's on such topics as emancipation, black service in the Union ranks and black suffrage, and how his views initially contrasted with, but were eventually influenced by, Douglass's fiery arguments in public speeches and newspaper editorials. This is a workmanlike narrative of the same story recently explored by James Oakes in his critically praised The Radical and the Republican. 23 b&w photos. (Feb.) (c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved
From Library Journal:
Paul Kendrick (assisant director, Harlem Children's Zone) and his father, Stephen (senior minister, First Church in Boston), carefully study two men who confronted the powerful elites of their era, Lincoln able to become an insider and Douglass exerting power in the very face of exclusion. Each man's views moderated, Douglass coming to admire Lincoln after initial disappointment and Lincoln coming to recognize the need for emancipation. Public and academic libaries with James Oakes's estimable The Radical and the Republican should consider this good study an optional addition. (c) Copyright 2010. Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.
Kendrick, Paul
Adult Nonfiction E449.D75 K46 2008
| |||||||||||
From Publishers' Weekly:
Paul Kendrick, assistant director of the Harlem Children's Zoo, and his father, Stephen, a Boston minister (coauthors of Sarah's Long Walk, about Boston's free blacks) give a thorough look at two unlikely allies. Lincoln began as a white supremacist who saw Douglass as an exception to the rule of black inferiority. What is more, his first priority was the preservation of the Union. The onetime slave Douglass, on the other hand, stood uncompromisingly for complete emancipation, to be followed by full and equal citizenship. He further held that the Civil War's massive carnage could only be redeemed by the annihilation of the "peculiar institution." Despite their mutual respect, the two men had only three face-to-face meetings, just two of these in private. Thus, this study of Douglass, Lincoln and their "relationship" is chiefly a discussion of evolving rhetoric, primarily Lincoln's on such topics as emancipation, black service in the Union ranks and black suffrage, and how his views initially contrasted with, but were eventually influenced by, Douglass's fiery arguments in public speeches and newspaper editorials. This is a workmanlike narrative of the same story recently explored by James Oakes in his critically praised The Radical and the Republican. 23 b&w photos. (Feb.) (c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved
From Library Journal:
Paul Kendrick (assisant director, Harlem Children's Zone) and his father, Stephen (senior minister, First Church in Boston), carefully study two men who confronted the powerful elites of their era, Lincoln able to become an insider and Douglass exerting power in the very face of exclusion. Each man's views moderated, Douglass coming to admire Lincoln after initial disappointment and Lincoln coming to recognize the need for emancipation. Public and academic libaries with James Oakes's estimable The Radical and the Republican should consider this good study an optional addition. (c) Copyright 2010. Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.
Be the first to add a comment! Share your thoughts about this title. Would you recommend it? Why or why not?
Question about returns, requests or other account details?
| Submission Guidelines |

